Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Hill v. Topper et al
as 2:2022cv02228
Plaintiff:
William Mark Hill
Defendant:
F/N/U Topper, F/N/U Woodland and F/N/U Boyd or Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Woodland et al
as 2:2022cv02227
Plaintiff:
William Mark Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Woodland, F/N/U Topper and F/N/U Boyd or Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
J. D. Littlejohn, III
Defendant:
Core Civic, Dameon T. Hininger, David M. Garfinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA et al
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mario Bowles
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA, Warden f/n/u Frink, Assistant Warden J. Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv00858
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Martin
Defendant:
Lt. E. Hill and Nurse Stetmanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stapp v. Elizabethton Police Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. STAPP and Timothy D Stapp
Defendant:
ELIZABETHTON POLICE DEPT., Carter County Sheriff's Office, E.P.D. SGT. CURTIS L. BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2021cv00743
Plaintiff:
J. D. Littlejohn, III
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon T. Hininger, David M. Garfinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumpus v. Porter et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Patrick L. Bumpus and Zakiya
Defendant:
Captain f/n/u Porter, Lt. f/n/u McDavis, Unit Manager f/n/u Bermudez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. USA
as 2:2021cv00105
Petitioner:
Joshua Brandon Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shirley v. Hynes-Simms et al
as 3:2021cv00467
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Mr. Mason, Stacy Oakes and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
