Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2011cv00503
Plaintiff: Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant: Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00351
Stricken As A Co-respondent Per Order Of 3/22/11: ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER
Respondent: DEPUTY SUPT. CRAIG A. HANKS SR.
Petitioner: MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. HANKS
as 2:2011cv00052
Respondent: ALAN FINNAN and CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner: JOSEPH ERNEST TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. STINE et al
as 1:2011cv00060
Defendant: DR. M'S ELLERT, HANKS, M'S PRICE and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. HANKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01420
Respondent: CRAIG A. HANKS
Petitioner: MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. HANKS
as 1:2010cv00876
Respondent: CRAIG A. HANKS
Petitioner: MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOODY v. HANKS
as 2:2010cv00171
Respondent: CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner: JOSHUA MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. HANKS
as 1:2010cv00668
Respondent: CRAIG A. HANKS
Petitioner: MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant: JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff: Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant: Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?