Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Williams et al v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Williams, Charles L. Wooten and Stephen Todd Hines
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, H.C.D.C. Medical Staff, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabor v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Gary Justin Tabor
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center and Danny Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goostree v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shawn Goostree
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2016cv00029
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Tyrice C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brand v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Lonnie R. Brand, Jr.
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center and Hardin County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickard v. Hardy
as 3:2015cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Pickard
Defendant:
Hardy and Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2014cv00920
Petitioner:
Corky Alexander
Respondent:
D.O.C. and Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dennison v. Marion County Sheriff Office et al
as 6:2014cv02184
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Dennison
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff Office, Hardin County Detention Center, Easton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2014cv00682
Plaintiff:
Isaias Santiago Vazquez
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catoe v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
John Robert Catoe
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners, Christy Abrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
