Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Eubanks v. Almond et al
as 7:2010cv01909
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Eubanks
Defendant:
Brad Almond, Scott Holmes, Belinda Medlers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Holmes (Inmate 1)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv01069
Plaintiff:
Dallas L. Simmons
Defendant:
David Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2008cv00821
Plaintiff:
Richard Kyle Reeves
Defendant:
Warden Jones, J. C. Giles, Warden Mason and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. United States of America
as 5:2007cv08012
Petitioner:
James Holmes
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holmes v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2007cv00241
Plaintiff:
Wesley Keith Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Major Torbert and Lt. Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Deloach et al (INMATE2)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2007cv00219
Plaintiff:
Dexter Regene Holmes
Defendant:
James Deloach, Phyllis Billups, Gwendolyn Tarrance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Masoud v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00008
Petitioner:
Suleiman Mohamed Masoud
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, James Ziglar, M. Francis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.