Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Jeff Gordon v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 12-40906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFF GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division, LANNETTE LINTHICUM, M.D. and OWEN J MURRAY, D.O.
Lover v. Livingston et al
as 4:2012cv01425
Plaintiff:
Damey Louis Lover
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Denise De Shields, MD, Dr. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lover v. Livingston et al
as 3:2012cv00169
Plaintiff:
Damey Louis Lover
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Denise De Shields, MD, Dr. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guyton Stennett v. Dominguez, et al
as 12-50321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUYTON STENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DOMINGUEZ, Dr., GORE, Dr., OWEN J MURRAY, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine and others
Kevin Althouse v. Owen Murray, et al
as 12-40242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN REID ALTHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
OWEN J MURRAY, STEPHEN HURT, S. FIELDS and others
Murray v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2012cv00105
Petitioner:
William J Murray
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daugherty v. Livingston et al
as 3:2011cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Daugherty
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Lannette Linthicum, Allan Hightower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Althouse v. Murray et al
as 6:2011cv00608
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reid Althouse
Defendant:
Owen J Murray, Stephen Hurt, S Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leal v. Cox et al
as 6:2011cv06544
Plaintiff:
Miguel Leal
Defendant:
Carl C. Cox, Todd Piasecki, Jacob Miller, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Livingston et al -
as 3:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Jeff Gordon
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Lannette Linthicum, Owen J Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
