Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Bush v. Hetzel et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
Wesley Maurice Bush
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, John Doe Anglen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQuarley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Carlos McQuarley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, John Doe Anglen, John Doe Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortner v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00721
Plaintiff:
Darelle Fortner
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Jane Doe Caffie, John Doe Anglen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00720
Plaintiff:
Andre Deon Jones
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel , Jane Lightening, John Doe Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 4:2012cv01998
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Carter Davenport, Corizen Health and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Harris et al
as 6:2011cv04047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Smith
Defendant:
Richard W Harris, James Whitman, Roger Hayes and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv02000
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEMITRI BROWN
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, LAPPIN, R. S. BALLASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hester et al
as 2:2008cv02013
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miller
Defendant:
Hester, McCord, Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JACKSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv01713
Plaintiff:
Leon Jackson
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, US Marshal Service, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Schmitz et al
as 4:2007cv01915
Plaintiff:
Ernest Williams
Defendant:
Jason Schmitz, Jesse Colvin, Tammy Jacoby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
