Cases 31 - 40 of 672
MCCURTY v. SHEPARD et al
as 5:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
WARDEN STAN SHEPARD, TIMOTHY WARD, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. JOHN DOES et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
EUGENE THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Deputy Sheriff VICTOR PURNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v CULLEN et al
as 5:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
SHERIFF CULLEN, CAPTAIN WESTBROOK, LT RUNYON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBB v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
RICK ALLEN WEBB
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. MASON et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
JENNIFER MASON, DIXON and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fendley v. King et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gary J. Fendley
Defendant:
Amy King, Jane Doe, Officer Bahaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskin v. Labott et al
as 1:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
DeSean M. Baskin
Defendant:
Patrick Labott, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. SALES et al
as 5:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
MARION BERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PONDER v. DOES et al
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
