Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Harris #113830 v. Shinn, et al.
as 2:2022cv00567
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
David C Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris #113830 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
David C Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright, Jason v. Reyes, Alejandro et al
as 3:2021cv00771
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Alejandro Reyes, Nathan Kandis, Kyle McNally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joslin v. Champaign County Police Department
as 2:2021cv02259
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Joslin
Defendant:
Champaign County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #113830 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01487
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
David C Shinn, Unknown Ridenour, Unknown Stickley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #113830 v. Gates et al
as 2:2021cv01378
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Pamela Gates, Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County, David C Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #113830 v. Tuchi et al
as 2:2021cv01389
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
John J Tuchi, Michelle H Burns and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris #113830 v. Shinn
as 2:2021cv01325
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
David C Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #113830 v. Pavlova et al
as 2:2021cv01283
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
A Pavlova, S Jason, Unknown Stickely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #113830 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01117
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
