Cases 31 - 40 of 41
BRAGG v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE et al
as 3:2013cv04088
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG, ERIC G. FORD, KEVIN L. CONEY and others
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, CHARLES ELLIS, WARDEN, RICHARD BEARDEN, CAPTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmberg v. Warner et al
as 3:2013cv05069
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmberg
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Dan Pacholke, G Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Holmberg v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 12-36001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HOLMBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, Secretary DOC, DAN PACHOLKE, Deputy Director, PATRICK GLEBE, Superintendent and others
Holmberg v. Vail et al
as 3:2011cv05449
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmberg
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Dan Pacholke, Patrick Glebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horonzy v. Correctional Corporation of America Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
John E Horonzy
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America Inc, Brenner, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOHSFIELD v. YATAVRO et al
as 2:2011cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOHSFIELD
Defendant:
MEG YATAURO, BUCHANAN, COREY CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wells et al
as 2:2010cv00952
Plaintiff:
Jerrel Jones
Defendant:
Gregory Wells, Tanith Rogers, Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Valdez, et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman Gafatasi Lemusu v. DOJ, et al
as 08-5433
Petitioner - Appellant:
Herman Gafatasi Lemusu
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin and others
BENDY v. BRUNO
as 3:2008cv04273
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY BENDY, SR.
Defendant:
SHIELA BRUNO and JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
