Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Reid v. Inch et al
as 3:2018cv02101
Defendant:
Mark Inch, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon C. Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Larson et al
as 3:2017cv02341
Plaintiff:
Joel Perez
Defendant:
James J. Larson, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUISEPPE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GUISEPPE
Defendant:
MCFADDEN , REED , JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Kerestes, Beggs, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CEPEDA v. READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2017cv01635
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO CEPEDA
Defendant:
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JOHN DOE #3, OFFICER JOHN DOE #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUR v. LAUGHINGHOUSE et al
as 2:2016cv02281
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BAUR
Defendant:
B. LAUGHINGHOUSE, DEJESUS, S. SUDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabrera v. Clark et al
as 1:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jose Emmanuel Ortiz Cabrera
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jane Doe, Jane Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2014cv01654
Plaintiff:
JAMAR WILSON
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
