Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Shaw v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv02259
Plaintiff:
Deanna E. Shaw
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan Stirling, Charles Willams, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Darlington County et al
as 4:2021cv01504
Defendant:
Darlington County, Officer Corey McLaurin, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
David Quintel McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childers v. Cherokee County Sheriff's Deputy et al
as 7:2021cv00313
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and Cherokee County Sheriff's Deputy
Plaintiff:
Samuel Trinity Childers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wise v. Kendall
as 6:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wise and Cederick Wise
Defendant:
Brian Kendall, Ann Sheppard, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deas v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv00143
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Canon, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Destiny Deas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT v. HURWITZ
as 6:2020cv04335
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Crockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. Burger et al
as 0:2020cv03360
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., John Doe 3, Wal-Mart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Melville v. Barnes et al
as 1:2020cv03215
Plaintiff:
Courtney Melville
Defendant:
John Does 1-12 and Nannette F. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Ninth Circuit Solicitor's Office et al
as 2:2020cv02993
Defendant:
Benjamin Chad Simpson, John Does 1 - 10, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley R. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilar v. Barnes et al
as 4:2020cv02931
Plaintiff:
Armando Martinez Aguilar
Defendant:
Onuoha Jude, John Does 1-4 and Nanette Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
