Cases 31 - 40 of 2,140
THOMAS v. JOHN et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN, NIKKI and LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00699
Petitioner:
JOHN HARRIS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Conley et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Tonya Conley, Donny Betzner, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATHER v. HASSLER et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
REGINALD PRATHER
Defendant:
NATHAN HASSLER, JOHN MONTGOMERY, PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Darnell D Jackson and Darnell Devon Jackson
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Jason Smiley, Adam Leidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. ANONYMOUS HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Anonymous Health of Indiana, LLC, Jane Doe, R.N., John Doe, M.D. and others
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant:
G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
