Cases 31 - 40 of 237
MAYER et al v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 2:2021cv12393
Plaintiff:
DENNIS TARBY, MANUEL DIAZ, GLENN JONES and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WARDEN, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv03125
Respondent:
ASSISTANT WARDEN JONES and WARDEN, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WASHINGTON et al v. MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2020cv20713
Defendant:
NEAL HAMILTON, MAUREEN MILLER, DELORRES MANN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON, DEBORAH JONES-WASHINGTON, MICHAEL WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. JONES et al
as 1:2020cv18896
Defendant:
MR. G. JONES, MRS. KUSTNER, MR. ANDAJAR and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS and KEVIN ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSS v. JONES et al
as 3:2020cv18896
Defendant:
MR. G. JONES, MRS. KUSTNER, MR. ANDAJAR and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITT v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2020cv14678
Defendant:
SIDNEY GIDDONS, RICHARD SMITH, COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LOURENZO WITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv10760
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
GREGORY A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. ESSEX COUNTY
as 2:2020cv10333
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2020cv07270
Plaintiff:
LUIS A. TORRES
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, LIEUTENANT EIGENRAUCH, JAMES SLAUGHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
