Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Eddy v. Mingo et al
as 2:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Roy Dean Eddy
Defendant:
Derrick Mingo, Anthony Compton and Joseph Cooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Epps et al
as 1:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Thomas Randall Wilson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Gloria Perry, Mike Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Mixon v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RONALD KING, Superintendant, J. KIRKWOOD, Mailroom Supervisor and others
Newell v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
James C. Newell, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher B Epps, Ron King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. King et al
as 2:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
John Tad Hinton
Defendant:
Ronald King, Theresa Seabrook, Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
John Tad Hinton
Defendant:
Ronald King , Theresa Seabrook , Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaurin v. King et al
as 2:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Patrick McLaurin
Defendant:
Ron King, Johnnie Denmark, Brenda Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. King et al
as 2:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
La Tidtus Jones
Defendant:
Ron King, Theresa Seabrook, Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
La Tidtus Jones
Defendant:
Ron King , Theresa Seabrook , Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
James Ronnie Reeves
Defendant:
Ronald King , Debra Platt , Joseph Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
