Cases 31 - 40 of 733
Pemberton v. Patton, et al
as 15-6089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. PATTON, New Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections Substitute, in his official capacity, MARY FALLIN, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, in her official capacity only, JUSTIN JONES, Individuall and as Past Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Davis v. Jones
as 5:2015cv00513
Petitioner:
Omer Eugene Davis
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Daly v. Jones
as 5:2015cv00448
Petitioner:
Richard J Daly
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lemmons v. Houston, et al
as 15-6075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBIN DON LEMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HOUSTON, JEFF TROUTT, JANET DOWLING and others
Brewer v. Gilroy, et al
as 15-7027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY DEWAYNE BREWER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEANA GILROY, Sergeant, FNU PAVLUKEVICK, Corrections Officer, JIMMY MARTIN, Warden's Administrative Assistant and others
Miller v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rusell Miller
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Mark Knutson, Mike Mullin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant and others
Briggs v. Jones et al
as 6:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Derrill Briggs
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Bruce Howard, Paula Inge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pemberton v. Patton et al
as 6:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Paul Pemberton
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Justin Jones, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
