Cases 31 - 40 of 468
Woods (ID 77647) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and (fnu) Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
James Nicholas Atkins
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections, American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wren v. (fnu) (lnu)
as 5:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Wren
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03084
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Kris W. Kobach and Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Merryfield v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03066
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Merryfield
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brinkley (ID 60164) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03047
Petitioner:
Sherrell Gary Brinkley
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merryfield v. Fleet et al
as 5:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Merryfield
Defendant:
Kelsey Fleet, Jason Jester, Xan Bowersox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White (ID 110786) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03034
Plaintiff:
Ian Brent White
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Cowley County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Burch
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
