Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Cox v. South Carolina, State of
as 8:2017cv00728
Petitioner:
Paul Leslie Cox
Respondent:
Warden of Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Witherspoon v. Matthews et al
as 9:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jarode Jermaine Witherspoon
Defendant:
Johnny A Matthews, NFN Baxter, CIS Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2016cv03910
Petitioner:
Alexander Bernard Wilson, Jr
Respondent:
Warden, Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ivey v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2016cv01037
Petitioner:
Rodney Dale Ivey
Respondent:
Warden of Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smalls v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 9:2016cv00639
Petitioner:
Leroy K Smalls, II
Respondent:
Warden of Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Kirkland CIs Mailroom et al
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
Anthony Quentin Robinson
Defendant:
Kirkland CIs Mailroom and Kirkland Correctional Institution Property Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2015cv02563
Petitioner:
Christopher B Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marcus Joseph v. Henry Turbeville
as 15-6935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS ALBINUS JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus Albines Joseph, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY M. TURBEVILLE, ANNELLE G. POWELL, Magistrate Judge in Clarendon County, GARY MARTIN and others
Kelly v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2015cv01518
Petitioner:
Albert S Kelly
Respondent:
Warden Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Witt v. Bright et al
as 6:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
John Victor Witt
Defendant:
Mr Bright, Kirkland Correctional Institute, David Dejoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
