Cases 31 - 40 of 45
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv03396
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. Kannes et al
as 1:2011cv00890
Plaintiff:
Gilberto A Colon
Defendant:
Robert J Kannes, Connie Rhen, Edward Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. WAGNER et al
as 5:2011cv01888
Plaintiff:
KAREEM GARRETT
Defendant:
GEORGE WAGNER, KEVIN BARNHARDT, FRANCO TASSONE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. STERN et al
as 2:2011cv01659
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WALKER
Defendant:
ANDREW J. STERN, KLINE & SPECTER, ANGIE OTERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. CANTEEN CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. HOWARD
Defendant:
CANTEEN CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. , THOMAS KLINE , ERNEST MARKHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kline v. USA
as 4:2010cv02063
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steve E. Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2010cv01108
Plaintiff:
GARY DAVIS
Defendant:
SCOTT ADAMS, HAROLD KLINE, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peet v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Peet and Lawrence J. Peet
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., Then Acting Warden of the SCI Camp Hill, John A. Palakovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIRNEISEN v. BCCY OF READING, PA et al
as 5:2010cv00673
Petitioner:
KRYSTAL HIRNEISEN
Respondent:
BCCY OF READING, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA, KELLY S. KLINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kline v. United States et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Petitioner:
Steven E. Kline
Respondent:
United States and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
