Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Cameron and Leslie Dewayne Cameron
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Warden Thompkins, Warden Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. State of Alabama
as 4:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Curtis Lamar Davidson
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacoby v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Karen Carter, Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Brian Thompkins, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Thompkins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Brian Thompkins, David Lamar, Mr. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Donald Lamar May
Defendant:
Heath Jackson and Lieutenant Pat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Headley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Olando Jackson and Burger
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Michael O. Calhoun, Lamar Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.