Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 152
Quinn v. Gore et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff: Keenan Quinn
Defendant: Catherine Gore, Steven H. Goldberg, Jay Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Viserto v. Lane We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv02370
Petitioner: Anthony Viserto
Respondent: Kathy P. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mabry v. Lane We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02358
Petitioner: James Mabry
Respondent: Kathy P. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCreagh v. Lane
as 3:2017cv02048
Petitioner: Donnell McCreagh
Respondent: Kathy P. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sahagun v. Lane We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01919
Petitioner: Alexander Rodriguez Sahagun
Respondent: Kathy P. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alsop v. Lane We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01737
Petitioner: Christopher Alsop
Respondent: Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. ARMEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01237
Plaintiff: CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant: ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBRA A. HAWKINBERRY, WILLIAM TIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HTUT v. LANE et al
as 5:2017cv04021
Petitioner: WIN MIN HTUT
Respondent: JAY LANE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STONE v. LANE et al
as 2:2017cv01068
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER M. STONE
Defendant: JAY LANE, STEPHEN M. GATES, REBECCA PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Toaz v. Lane et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01425
Plaintiff: Craig Alan Toaz
Defendant: Kathy P. Lane, D. Altizer, C. Rothermel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?