Cases 31 - 40 of 104
ROSADO v. JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN) et al
as 3:2018cv00601
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO FRATICELLI ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN), Mooney , Goyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLEETS v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv00256
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM SLEETS
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, JAMES P. CULLEN, THE LAW OFFICE OF CLYMER MUSSER & CONRAD P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCKSHAW v. PITTSBURGH LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv00078
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
PITTSBURGH LAW DEPARTMENT, PITTBURGH MUNICIPAL COURT, PARKWAY CENTER MALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARPER v. HARRELL et al
as 2:2017cv05603
Plaintiff:
IRVIN HARPER
Defendant:
KELLY HARRELL, LARRY KRASNER, DANIAL OMALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSADO v. JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN) et al
as 1:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO FRATICELLI ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN), MOONEY, GOYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDAWAY v. BOONSWANG LAW et al
as 2:2017cv03370
Plaintiff:
SONNY RAY HARDAWAY
Defendant:
BOONSWANG LAW and CHAD G. BOONSWANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCUSKER v. PERUTO et al
as 2:2017cv02889
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCCUSKER
Defendant:
A. CHARLES PERUTO, JR., THE LAW OFFICES OF A. CHARLES PERUTO, JR. ESQ, SCOTT SIGMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAW v. REILLY et al
as 2:2016cv05335
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LAW
Defendant:
JOHN A. REILLY, JR., KEVIN M. CONROY, DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF PRISON INSPECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2016cv04153
Plaintiff:
JERRY GLENN
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS, ADRIAN HAREWOOD, SHIFT COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAW v. DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv03028
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LAW
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, JACK WHELAN, DE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
