Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Rowan v. Workers' Compensation/Rowan Law Firm et al
as 2:2015cv02206
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
Workers' Compensation/Rowan Law Firm, City of Memphis, U.S. Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinner v. Moore et al
as 2:2015cv02105
Defendant:
Moore, Aston Smith, Maurice Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Kinner and Timothy Kinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington v. Baine et al
as 2:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Bryan Perry Nelson Covington
Defendant:
C.O. Baine, Correct Health, C.O. Horner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Law Enforcement Unit, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Hamblen County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriff's Department, Correct Health Inc., Teresa Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragan v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2014cv00694
Plaintiff:
Teddy Ragan
Defendant:
State of Texas, Child Protection Services, Metro Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Fayne et al
as 4:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jack Perry
Defendant:
Michael Fayne, Kenneth Shelton, Law Firm of Robert T. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Schofield et al
as 3:2013cv00872
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Hill
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Eric Qualls, Robert Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folliot v. Law Offices of Erwin & Hall et al
as 2:2013cv02554
Plaintiff:
Baudoin Folliot
Defendant:
Law Offices of Erwin & Hall and Jacob E. Erwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Schwendimann et al
as 3:2013cv00702
Plaintiff:
Johnny W. Brown
Defendant:
Donald Schwendimann, Ricky Peebles, Alton Hesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
