Cases 31 - 40 of 806
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Byron Pipkin
Respondent:
Lee V. Coffee and Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Sumner County Jail
as 3:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Adams
Defendant:
Sumner County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hinninger et al
as 1:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
David Hinninger, All Board of Trustees/All Members, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Pounds
as 3:2023cv01062
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Jones
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Pounds
as 3:2023cv01063
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Jones
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of H/C-Death Penalty
Thompson v. Nurse Kim et al
as 3:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Nurse Kim, Nurse Crystal, Dickson County Sheriff's Department & Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Fraley et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Porter, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Fraley, Matt Patterson, Steve Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hickman v. Bowles et al
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Rickey Allen Hickman
Respondent:
Lee Bowles, William Haywood, Jame Tucker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown, Sr. v. Lee
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
James D. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
