Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Donald Crowder v. Lowndes County Superior Court
as 18-12715
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD CROWDER
Respondent - Appellee:
LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CROWDER v. LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 7:2018cv00065
Petitioner:
DONALD CROWDER
Respondent:
LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOLEY v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS DANTE COOLEY
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN et al v. GREENE et al
as 7:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
AARON L GREEN, JR
Defendant:
BETH C GREENE, LATOYA BROWN, PAMELA FLETCHER-NESMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayborn v. Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00120
Petitioner:
Jefferson Clayborn
Respondent:
Lowndes County Mississippi , Mississippi Department of Corrections and Holmes Humphrey Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shablesky v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M. Shablesky
Defendant:
Barry Stanford, John Stanback, Sarah Rickert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayborn v. Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Clayborn
Defendant:
Lowndes County, Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Holmes Humphrey Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 7:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
DARRYL ROBINSON
Defendant:
VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, COLBY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARTEE v. LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
as 7:2017cv00050
Petitioner:
SEDRIC M WATERS PARTEE
Respondent:
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OWENS v. LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 7:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ ANTONIO OWENS
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
