Cases 31 - 40 of 1,068
El-Bey v. Morman
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Debora Morman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Copeland
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Melis Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Phiuu
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Melissa Marie Phiuu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Siddha v. Circuit Court for Carroll County Court Reporters' Office et al
as 1:2023cv03525
Plaintiff:
Yimoe Nitya Siddha
Defendant:
Circuit Court for Carroll County Court Reporters' Office, Michael Burns, Lisa Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hitchens v. Montgomery County Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv03523
Plaintiff:
Michael Hitchens
Defendant:
Montgomery County Police Department and Officer Lanjon Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv03436
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Krystin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Lanham
as 1:2023cv03427
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Candace McLaren Lanham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Quattrocki
as 1:2023cv03428
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Carolyn A. Quattrocki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2023cv03308
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Martin
Defendant:
Scott Shellenberger, Gerret P. Glennon, Brian Botts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Conaway
as 1:2023cv03268
Petitioner:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Respondent:
Xavier Conaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
