Cases 31 - 40 of 402
Chester Ray Wiseman v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv11813
Defendant:
A. Hernandez, Deleo, Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Chester Ray Wiseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley Parker Weltch v. R. Bogh et al
as 5:2020cv02545
Defendant:
Castillo, Morris, R. Bogh and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Parker Weltch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv08622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris Day v. Jackie Lacey et al
as 2:2020cv08132
Petitioner:
Morris Day and Rickey Louis Alford
Respondent:
Jackie Lacey and Sheriff Alex Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Louis Alford v. Public Defender Office, L.A. County et al
as 2:2020cv08127
Plaintiff:
Rickey Louis Alford and Morris Day
Defendant:
John Neo Nazi, Doe, Ku Klux Klan and Public Defender Office, L.A. County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ulis Morris v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2020cv07402
Petitioner:
Ulis Morris
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Ascencio et al
as 3:2020cv04923
Defendant:
Todan Ascencio and Tracy Jackson
Plaintiff:
Phillip Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley Parker Weltch v. Officer Bogh et al
as 5:2020cv01459
Defendant:
Officer Vest, Officer Castillo, Officer Bogh and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Parker Weltch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris Day v. Watson et al
as 2:2020cv06555
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, Time, Inc. and Time-Warner, Celtic and Laker of NBA and others
Defendant:
Watson, Parole Hearing, Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris Day v. Watson et al
as 2:2020cv06045
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, L.A. County Times Warner, Rickey Louis Alford and others
Defendant:
John Doe I, Municipal Court Corporation, Sheriff Deputy Servillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
