Cases 31 - 40 of 292
Winters v. Sevier
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel A Winters and Emmanuel Winters
Defendant:
Mark Sevier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
NIGEL TRICE JOYNER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER, SCOTT FITCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYNER et al v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02450
Plaintiff:
NIGEL TRICE JOYNER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER, SCOTT FITCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02390
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROCK v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC et al
as 1:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALAN SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANLEY v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02327
Petitioner:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT III v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv02297
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BERNARD CROCKETT III
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FELTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02133
Plaintiff:
ISAAC FELTON
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, MARK SEVIER and JENNIFER FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL SR COBB
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUTH v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01906
Petitioner:
BENNIE LEE TRUTH
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
