Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Bullock v. Rowland et al
as 1:2019cv00009
Plaintiff: Quentin Lamar Bullock
Defendant: Debra Wagonschutz, Valarie Marshall, Kellwell Food Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Rowland et al
as 1:2019cv00002
Defendant: Debra Wagonschutz, Valarie Marshall, Kellwell Food Management and others
Plaintiff: Corey Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Rowland et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant: Debra Wagonschutz, Valarie Marshall, Kellwell Food Management and others
Plaintiff: Trevor Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Rowland et al
as 1:2019cv00004
Defendant: Debra Wagonschutz, Valarie Marshall, Kellwell Food Management and others
Plaintiff: Blake Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Rowland et al
as 1:2019cv00005
Defendant: Wayne Simmons, Valarie Marshall, Lieutenant Debra Wagonschutz and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00491
Defendant: U.S. Marshals Service and United States of America
Plaintiff: Andrew Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Popple v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01300
Petitioner: Marshall A. Popple
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ibrihim v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02429
Petitioner: Siraj Ibrihim
Respondent: Jackson, A.W. Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crain v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2018cv02360
Petitioner: Robert Crain
Respondent: AW Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and United States Marshals' Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel v. United States Marshal
as 1:2018cv00097
Plaintiff: Thaddeus D Daniel
Defendant: United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?