Cases 31 - 40 of 149
Gibson et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01729
Plaintiff:
Adela Gibson and Richard Moore
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, J LaFontaine, Unknown LaFontaine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kohler v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01565
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa City Attorney's Office, Charles Kent Carroll, Rachel Phipps-Yonas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01165
Plaintiff:
Bryson D McGee and Bryson Devorn McGee
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Spencer Wilson and R Trevizo-Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Mesa v. USA
as 2:2021cv01042
Petitioner:
Carlos Garcia-Mesa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00946
Defendant:
N Bover, L Craft, T Stearman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keith Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lallande v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00918
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department, W Smith, G Fenlon and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joseph Lallande
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragsdale v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2021cv00873
Petitioner:
Todd Albert Ragsdale
Respondent:
Mesa City Attorney's Office, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Windish v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00311
Plaintiff:
Theodore Windish
Defendant:
James Derivan, Scott Callender, Justin Organ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Richard Rosales, City of Mesa Police Department and Mesa, City of
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shadid v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Parties, Unknown Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Philip Shadid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
