Cases 31 - 40 of 1,313
Jones #617568 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Justin Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Karklin v. O'Bell Winn, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROY KARKLIN
Defendant:
O'BELL T. WINN, GARY MINIARD, CARROLL WALKER and others
L. Tucker, Jr. v. Kristine Miller, et al
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
L. T. TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
KRISTINE MILLER, C/O, Prison Guard, SERGEANT AMANDA WYATT, Prison Guard, MICHAEL TURUNEN, Prison Guard and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Parsons v. Paige et al
as 5:2024cv10247
Plaintiff:
David Parsons
Defendant:
Paige and Spaulding
Interested Party:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Lentz v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10198
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
MDOC, Heidi Washington, Aleksandra Wilanowski and others
Murphy #769317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murphy #769317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley #136985 v. Coe et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Carl Ashley #136985
Defendant:
E'Coe Hill, Heather Doolittle, Jacob Clapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv10079
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Matthew Baranski, John Doe and others
Crump v. Nagy et al
as 2:2023cv13138
Defendant:
Eric Stockall, Noah Nagy, Tiffani Kisor and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Len Crump
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
