Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Robinson et al v. Aiken, City of et al
as 1:2015cv00665
Plaintiff:
Monterell Robinson , Sharonda Robinson , Kyson Swinger and others
Defendant:
Aiken, City of, The , Michael Hunt , Chris Chavous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Major v. Norris et al
as 5:2014cv04189
Plaintiff:
Matthew Major
Defendant:
Mr. Norris, Joyce Brunson and Cpl Eli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haygood v. West Columbia Police Dept et al
as 3:2014cv03886
Plaintiff:
Vernon Lee Haygood
Defendant:
West Columbia Police Dept, John King, William Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Boome et al
as 1:2014cv00722
Plaintiff:
Mildenzel Malcolm Davis
Defendant:
Kenny Boome, Maj Norris, Cpt Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Boome et al
as 1:2014cv00422
Plaintiff:
Mildenzel Malcolm Davis
Defendant:
Kenny Boome, Maj Norris, Cpt Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah-Malik v. Bryant et al
as 1:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Akeem Alim-Nafis Abdullah-Malik
Defendant:
Bruce M Bryant, James F Arwood, Richard L Martin, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. South Carolina, The State of
as 1:2013cv01824
Petitioner:
Norris Allen Martin
Respondent:
South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris v. Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 8:2013cv00913
Petitioner:
Michael D Norris
Respondent:
Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Rush et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Norris Allen Martin
Defendant:
F Emory Rush, Michael R Culler, Jr, Jack Colman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singletary v. Norris et al
as 5:2012cv02384
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Singletary
Defendant:
Joey Norris, Joyce Brunson, Tressa Henneghai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
