Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Redden v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodger Dale Redden
Defendant:
Governor Nathan Deal and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00116
Defendant:
Chardonnay Dialysis Inc., Dr. Sharon Lewis, Dr. Mary Alston and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Mclain Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN v. DEAL et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL, STATE ATTORNEY GENER CHRISTOPHER CARR and COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. SOUTHEAST GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE et al
as 7:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES L GARLAND, SOUTHEAST GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Hunt et al
as 6:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
FNU Hunt, FNU Derbez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Gordon et al
as 6:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tavares Douglas Harris
Defendant:
Darrel Gordon, Mikasa Cooper, William Summersett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimbush v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv02085
Petitioner:
Therian Wimbush
Respondent:
Nathan Deal, Gregory C. Dozier, Willie Sue Mickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. State of Georgia et al
as 6:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Grady Renard Williams, Jr. and Reginald Charles Harvey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Lones et al
as 6:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
Laurel L. Lones, FNU Pearson, Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARNER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GARNER
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON , WALTER BERRY , GREGORY DOZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
