Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Gabelman v. Randolph County Justice Center et al
as 2:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
Cory Gregory Gabelman
Defendant:
Randolph County Justice Center, Randy Smith, Nancy Courtny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Chapman et al
as 5:2014cv06079
Plaintiff:
Steven D Turner
Defendant:
Thomas Nichols Chapman, Joseph Anthony Gagnon , J. Bartley Spear, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Saline County, Missouri et al
as 4:2014cv00444
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Loggins
Defendant:
Saline County, Missouri, Woods, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. Patterson et al
as 6:2013cv03042
Plaintiff:
Tracy Greer
Defendant:
Jack Patterson, Page Nichols, Judith Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hause v. Conley et al
as 2:2012cv04145
Plaintiff:
Allen W. Hause
Defendant:
Frank Conley, Cary Augustine, Larry Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lathan v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv00813
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Lathan
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Terry Russell, Nichole Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Denney et al
as 5:2010cv06049
Plaintiff:
Frederick Holmes
Defendant:
Larry Denney, Rogers, Magana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Dormire
as 4:2009cv00399
Petitioner:
Jesse l Nichols
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crutchfield v. Morzolf et al
as 2:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Crutchfield
Defendant:
Unknown Morzolf, Mark Nichols, Steve Holman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nichols v. St. Francois County Jail et al
as 4:2008cv00420
Plaintiff:
Steven John Nichols
Defendant:
St. Francois County Jail, Unknown Pettis, Richard Ett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
