Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 204
PHILLIPS v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00563
Petitioner: KAVOSAYE PHILLIPS
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lawson v. Sage et al
as 3:2023cv00946
Plaintiff: Willard Will Bee Lawson
Defendant: A Sage, Guzman, M Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHANDLER v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01710
Plaintiff: KEITH CHANDLER
Defendant: G. WILLIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. REASONER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01700
Plaintiff: JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant: DEBORAH REASONER, REAGLE, SCAFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. DICKSON et al
as 1:2023cv01675
Plaintiff: JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant: PAULA DICKSON, SCAFE, J. SHAVERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUGGLE v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv01596
Plaintiff: BRYAN PHILLIP JOSEPH TUGGLE
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv01562
Plaintiff: JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant: J. SHAVERS, E. KNOTTS, PAULA DICKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff: JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant: THOMAS, ERNEST, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISTRUNK v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00100
Plaintiff: GARY KEITH SISTRUNK
Defendant: SCOTT MAPLES, GURD, ESLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?