Cases 31 - 40 of 157
Carey v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Franetta Riley, Phyllis Billups and Captain Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Powell (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
Samuel Allan McCormick
Defendant:
Riley Powell, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2014cv00955
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Franetta Riley , Captain Logan and LaShanda Hails
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliland v. Lightner et al
as 1:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Adam Daniel Gilliland
Defendant:
Wanda Lightner and Hayward E. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posey v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00943
Plaintiff:
Clark L. Posey, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Frank Albright, Victor L. Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sides v. Riley et al
as 5:2013cv01815
Petitioner:
Lynda Alma Sides
Respondent:
Jack C Riley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bottoms v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Bottoms
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Dr. Warr, Ms. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
James Edward Spencer
Respondent:
Robert Bentley, Bob Riley, Don Siegelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
