Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Ollie Parker, III v. Kosanovich, et al
as 15-12202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE EDWARD PARKER, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KOSANOVICH, Officer, a.k.a. Psycho, RAINES, Sergeant, J. FERRO, Officer and others
THOMAS v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC et al.
as 3:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEVANDAL BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, MARSHA NICHOLS, JULIE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00609
Plaintiff:
Drew C Hartley
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, Edwin Buss, Kenneth S Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Magwood v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-10854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY L. MAGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARSHA NICHOLS, RICHARD COMERFORD and others
Dureco Brown v. W. Rummel, et al
as 14-15801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DURECO K. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
W. D. RUMMEL, D. MCGOWAN and M. NICHOLS, ARNP
THOMPSON v. RUMMEL et al
as 4:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant:
W D RUMMEL, JOHN LONG, DIANN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLES v. CREWS et al
as 3:2014cv00521
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE L BATTLES
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, WILLIAM WHITEHURST, CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. COMERFORD et al
as 3:2014cv00371
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LOPEZ
Defendant:
R COMERFORD, CYNTHIA COURTNEY, WILLIAM D RUMMELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joel Wetzel v. Daniel Brown, et al
as 14-2605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joel H. Wetzel
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Brown, Brian Koskovich, Jeremy Moser and others
Defendant:
William A. Herauf, Thomas Henning, James Hope and others
MAGWOOD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L MAGWOOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , MARSHA NICHOLS , RICHARD COMERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
