Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Giles et al v. Toulon Jr. Ed.D et al
as 1:2020cv03875
Plaintiff:
Isiah Ramos, Alexander Dixon, William Deppisch and others
Defendant:
Sergeants John & Jane Doe, Governor Cuomo, Correction Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. City of New York
as 1:2020cv06852
Defendant:
City of New York and Supreme Court of the State of New York
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Lopez v. Bruce, MD et al
as 1:2020cv02518
Defendant:
J. Ramos, Marilyn Garcia, MD, MDC H.S.A./MDC Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Ramos et al
as 1:2020cv03422
Defendant:
Judge Edgardo Ramos, Josh Dratel and Michael H. Sporn
Plaintiff:
Glenn MacPherson Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figueroa et al vs. Trump et al
as 9:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
Benny Ramos-David, Ranking Smith, Servando Jose Gomez and others
Defendant:
United States B.O.P., William Barr and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gabriel v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00371
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas Feeley and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Ramos Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mercado-Ramos v. Noeth
as 6:2019cv06769
Respondent:
Superintendent Joseph H. Noeth
Petitioner:
Edgurdo J. Mercado-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Walker et al
as 1:2019cv07980
Defendant:
Dr. Jane Doe, Deputy of Security John Doe, Deputy Warden Walker and others
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Interested Party:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. New York City et al
as 1:2019cv07156
Defendant:
Melissa Jimenez-De Armas, Scott Stringer, Police Officer Lorraine Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
D'Juan Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Ramos et al
as 1:2019cv07064
Defendant:
Capt. Shaw, Dr. Raul Ramos, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
