Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Fletcher v. Stewart, et al
as 1:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
Al S. Fletcher
Defendant:
Nurse Harvey, Nano Richardson, Mary Cooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Morgan et al
as 5:2015cv00834
Plaintiff:
Alexceon Richardson
Defendant:
Chad A Morgan, Jeremy M Phipps, Montague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracy v. Dunn, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles William Bracy, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Cassandra Conway, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Richardson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Sergeant Richardson, Phyllis Billups, Billy Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burch v. Thomas et al
as 7:2014cv01812
Plaintiff:
Vincent Edward Burch
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, III, V. Richardson, John Hutton and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Callahan et al
as 5:2014cv01546
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Stone
Defendant:
Rebekah A Callahan, Alabama, State of, Madison County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Billups et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Phyllis Billups , Captain Logan , Brennis J Baskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Sean Tyler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Corizon Medical Services, CMS and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael James Craig
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Ossie Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Rathman
as 1:2013cv01346
Petitioner:
Watkins Richardson
Respondent:
John T Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
