Cases 31 - 40 of 240
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE, MANUEL SANTIAGO, THE ESTATE OF CHARLES PERMINT and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHALIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
STANTON v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SCHUYLKILL et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Respondent:
Lieu, M. Klobe, Bartholemew and others
Petitioner:
Leon Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Haste et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, Lt. Tim Manwiller, Mike Pries and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANTON v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SCHUYLKILL et al
as 2:2020cv06556
Respondent:
LIEU, M. KLOBE, LIEUTENANT KENNEY and others
Petitioner:
LEON STANTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. SUPERNTENDENT, SCI FOREST et al
as 2:2020cv06124
Respondent:
SUPERNTENDENT, SCI FOREST, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROGERS v. OBERLANDER
as 2:2020cv04360
Respondent:
DEREK OBERLANDER
Petitioner:
KAREEM ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYO v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
SERGEANT MCCLELLAND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS and UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TRAINOR v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
CRNP BRENDA HARTZELL, C. HAYS, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAINOR and JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Simonetti v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2020cv01345
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Simonetti
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Gregory C. Briggs and Roger C. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv01283
Defendant:
Warden Gregory Briggs, John A. Addison, Brian S. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Doughty Dajoure Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
