Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-55937
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-99011
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Shabazz v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2022cv05569
Plaintiff:
Amir Shabazz
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coles v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv05349
Plaintiff:
George E. Coles
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv05126
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mills
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saif'ullah v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv05017
Plaintiff:
Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah and Fernando Jackson
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 5:2022cv04837
Plaintiff:
Odell D. Hodges
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), California State Prison of San Quentin, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hovarter v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv04640
Petitioner:
Jackie Ray Hovarter
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maury v. Seamon et al
as 4:2022cv04463
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Maury
Defendant:
C. Seamon, Ron Broomfield and Connie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Newsome et al
as 4:2022cv04482
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson
Defendant:
Mayor Gavin Newsome, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
