Cases 31 - 40 of 369
Wilson v. CCDOC Cermak Health Care Unit et al
as 1:2022cv04353
Plaintiff:
Deandre T. Wilson, Sr.
Defendant:
CCDOC Cermak Health Care Unit, Tom Dart, Gregory R Haman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv01796
Plaintiff:
David A. Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and Mr. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Shawnee Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01778
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ryan Diaz, Sr.
Defendant:
Shawnee Corrections and Kim Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Greene, et al
as 3:2022cv03119
Plaintiff:
Ray T Slack, Sr
Defendant:
Brittany Greene and Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Kelley et al
as 1:2022cv03488
Plaintiff:
Ralph T. Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Kelley, Santerelli, V. Perillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Chapman
as 3:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Ray T Slack, Sr.
Defendant:
Thomas Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winfield v. Cook County Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv03025
Plaintiff:
Rickey Terrell Winfield, Sr.
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickling, Sr. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv50169
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Mickling, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mickling, Sr. v. Waltert et al
as 3:2022cv50168
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Mickling, Sr.
Defendant:
Waltert, Heim, U.S.P. Thomson Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ray Sr. v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
John L Ray Sr.
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Cook County Jail Mail Room Security Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
