Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Elkins v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00071
Petitioner:
Carl A Elkins and Carl A. Elkins
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Korona v. Nunn
as 22-5015
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN EX KORONA, AKA Brian Edward Xavier Korona
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN
Farley v. James Crabtree Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Farley
Defendant:
James Crabtree Correctional Center, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Throneberry v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00145
Petitioner:
Randall Duane Throneberry
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamarr v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Walter E Lamarr
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodfork v. Nunn, et al
as 22-6022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JERMAINE WOODFORK
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN, individually and in official capacity, Warden, FNU RACKLEY, individually and in official capacity, CO, MIKE ROGERS, individually and in official capacity, Chief of Security and others
Henson v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00105
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Nunn, Director DOC Scott Crow and others
Petitioner:
Tommie D Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spaulding v. Nunn et al
as 5:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Richard Patrick Spaulding
Defendant:
Warden Scott Nunn, Asst Warden Edward Mayfield, Chaplain FNU Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00037
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Nunn, Scott Crow and others
Petitioner:
Tommie D. Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Robert E Smith
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
