Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Buckenberger v. Milazzo
as 2:2017cv02862
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buckenberger
Defendant:
Jane Triche Milazzo, Unidentified Parties and Gerald J. Neilsen
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Castro v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv02117
Plaintiff:
Louis Castro
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice United States and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belvin v. Champagne, et al
as 2:2017cv01776
Plaintiff:
Anthony Belvin
Defendant:
Greg Champagne , Alvin Robinson , Unidentified Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00658
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Darren L. Settles, State of Tennessee, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14621
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Fajardo-Guevara v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv00488
Petitioner:
Patricia Fajardo-Guevara
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv12526
Plaintiff:
William Scott, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
O'Keefe v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
Michael H. O'Keefe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ricks-Stampley v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00389
Petitioner:
Ashley D. Ricks-Stampley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Poindexter v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv01180
Plaintiff:
Sareel Poindexter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
