Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Harris et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06779
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Phillipe Berkowitz, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feliz v. Park et al
as 1:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Abraham Clott, Charles Solomon, Jung Park and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velez v. Kelsey et al
as 6:2020cv06072
Defendant:
L. Baker, John Doe, Sandy Kelsey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Tony Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coston et al v. Conway et al
as 9:2019cv01552
Plaintiff:
Lando McMurren, Troy Derby, Tyvonni Purnell and others
Defendant:
Mahoney, Peterson, New York State Commission of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feliz v. Park et al
as 1:2019cv11661
Defendant:
Abraham Clott, Charles Solomon, Jung Park and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. McLaughlin et al
as 9:2019cv01526
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Riley
Defendant:
Dep. Egan, Deputy McLaughlin and Dep OConner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Swanson Services Corporation et al
as 9:2019cv01459
Defendant:
Dep. Egan, Dep. O'Connor and Swanson Services Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. CCS Medical Department et al
as 9:2019cv01450
Defendant:
CCS Medical Department, Dep. O'Connor and Dep. Egan
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. New York County et al
as 1:2019cv08009
Plaintiff:
Jabari Mann
Defendant:
Tony Durante, New York County, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
