Cases 31 - 40 of 250
Gibson v. Thomas et al
as 3:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Gibson
Defendant:
Karen Thomas, FNU Riley, Jermaine White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIDDLETON et al v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
JOHNELL MIDDLETON, JACORI HODGES and COREY HOLBROOKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00120
Defendant:
WARDEN STEADLEY
Respondent:
PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT EDWARDS, LT INGRAM, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES and others
Petitioner:
JONATHAN ANDREW HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McPherson v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Alicia Epperson, Robert Tooles, John Doe Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Robert Toole, Cedric Taylor, Timothy Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. WARD et al
as 7:2021cv00033
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, SCOTT CRICKMAR, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
SHEM O MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Coleman et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. Hammock, Officer Barkeley, Officer Spiers and others
Plaintiff:
James R. English, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassady v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Robert Toole, Commissioner Timothy Ward and Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Plaintiff:
David Dwayne Cassady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Johnson State Prison
as 3:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Kochelle Watson, Lt. FNU Causwell, FNU Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Martin Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00020
Plaintiff:
Damon Young
Defendant:
RN Cocran, Alisa Evans, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
