Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Oliveros v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Antonio Segundo Oliveros
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Janali v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sefidkar Janali
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Vance Laughlin, J. Shonebarger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kimble v. Vance et al
as 3:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Kimble
Defendant:
Jimmy Vance, Clyde Hill, Charles Doug Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Napoleon v. Laughlin
as 5:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Elin Napoleon
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mota v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Adams County Correctional Ctr, MS, Immigration & Naturalization Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ward v. Hill et al
as 5:2011cv00065
Defendant:
Unknown Hill, Unknown Vance, Unknown Stevenson and others
Plaintiff:
Alphonso T. Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Janali v. Corrections Corporation America et al
as 5:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Sefidkar Janali
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation America and Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maxwell v. Hininger et al
as 5:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Maxwell
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Vance Laughlin, Unknown Slavens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Giraldo v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Giraldo
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Adams County Correctional Center and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. CCA/ACCC et al
as 5:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Byron Alexander Meza Campbell
Defendant:
CCA/ACCC, UDC, DHO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
