Cases 31 - 39 of 39
ROBINS v. COLL et al
as 2:2011cv07501
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN ROBINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL F.X. COLL, MASTER JUDGE and WADE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pine v. USA
as 1:2010cv02106
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wade Randall Pine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SHAFFER v. VENANGO COUNTY COURT/LAUREL HIGHLANDS
as 1:2010cv00085
Petitioner:
WADE HAMPTON SHAFFER, JR.
Respondent:
VENANGO COUNTY COURT/LAUREL HIGHLANDS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaffer v. Venango County Court/Laurel Highlands
as 3:2010cv00531
Petitioner:
Wade Hampton Shaffer, Jr.
Respondent:
Venango County Court/Laurel Highlands and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROMLEIGH et al v. LAUER et al
as 1:2009cv00017
Petitioner:
TROY A. CROMLEIGH and ERNEST H. BRADLEY
Respondent:
WADE LAUER, RAYMOND SOBINA and THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BICKEL v. MILLER et al
as 1:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
ANDREW C. BICKEL
Defendant:
GORDON R. MILLER, TIM LEWIS, MORRIS WADE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SABEDRA v. MEADOWS et al
as 2:2008cv02480
Petitioner:
RICKEY SABEDRA
Respondent:
CHRISTINE MEADOWS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF HENRY WADE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF GREG ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SABEDRA v. MEADOWS et al
as 2:2008cv01762
Petitioner:
RICKEY SABEDRA
Respondent:
CHRISTIEN MEADOWS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF HENRY WADE, DALLAS, TEXAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF GREG ABBOT, AUSTIN, TEXAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KNIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2007cv02882
Petitioner:
WADE KNIGHT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
