Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Alexander #105500 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Charles LaVerne Alexander, II
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Terry Stewart, Samual Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2014cv02387
Defendant:
William G Montgomery and Kurt N Mills
Plaintiff:
Damiano Vidal Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2014cv02271
Plaintiff:
Danny Parnelli Parker
Defendant:
William G Montgomery, Leslie Lemense and Ariel Serafin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2014cv02085
Defendant:
William G Montgomery, Susan Edward and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Antwan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamwright v. Dahl et al
as 2:2014cv02039
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Overe Arshan Hamwright
Defendant:
Ellen M Dahl, William G Montgomery and Marcus Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2014cv00687
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray Scott
Defendant:
William G Montgomery and Jon Wendell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Rademacher et al
as 2:2013cv02637
Plaintiff:
Kendall L White
Defendant:
Jay Rademacher and William G Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv01574
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Joseph M Arpaio, S Heatherington and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Marzine Hudson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Cofield v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 13-16127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN W. COFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA, STATE OF, CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN KENDALL, 1st Boss Facility Health Administrator (FHA) at Eyman and others
Cofield #46955 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Stephen W Cofield
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, William G Montgomery, Haylee Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
