Cases 31 - 40 of 459
Willis v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Donelle Willis
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, C Cribbs, Cook County, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ziogas v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Ziogas
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Cheri Laurent, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Willis et al
as 1:2023cv00420
Petitioner:
Marcellus A French
Respondent:
Anthony Willis and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Doe, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Rushville TDF Administration
as 4:2022cv04177
Plaintiff:
Maceo G Willis, Jr
Defendant:
Rushville TDF Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Eilers et al
as 3:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
Willie James Harrison
Defendant:
Eilers, M Lively, Tyler King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv06710
Plaintiff:
Willie J Harrison
Defendant:
Kim Young, Joanna Sted, McNally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Engelage et al
as 3:2022cv02243
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Reva Engelage, C/O Baker, Angela Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Comier v. Wills
as 1:2022cv04432
Plaintiff:
Marion Andre Comier
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Wills and Anthony Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Truitt et al
as 1:2022cv04297
Petitioner:
Willie Hayes
Respondent:
Charles Truitt and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
