Cases 31 - 40 of 408
Woods v. City of Lancaster Texas et al
as 3:2021cv03027
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamar Woods
Defendant:
City of Lancaster Texas, Lancaster Police Department, R Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v.Bedford Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv03028
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamar Woods
Defendant:
Bedford Police Department, City of Bedford Texas, City of Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Keeter et al v. Woods et al
as 7:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jackie Keeter, Gregory Sosa, Charles Lamar Hicks and others
Defendant:
Terry Woods and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Shanklin et al
as 4:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
Alywen Dale Cross
Defendant:
Honorable Brody Shanklin, Sarah Woods and John Rentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mantei v. Sanchez
as 5:2021cv01025
Plaintiff:
Deron John Mantei
Defendant:
United States Federal Government, United States District Attorney, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. LeFlore et al
as 3:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Edward Neal Woods
Defendant:
Diane LeFlore, Andria Bender, Greg W Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) et al
as 9:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jaxon Wood
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
John Alfred Grimes
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Cause #007-1311-14, Bobby D. Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Woods
as 1:2021cv00579
Plaintiff:
Kendall Lamonte Smith
Defendant:
Zachary Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00209
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Terry Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
